Talmud for Avodah Zarah 2:9

Rebbi Jeremiah asked before Rebbi Zeïra¹⁰⁴The better reading is: R. Ḥanania before R. Mana; see the preceding note.: Does it mean, really like his produce? Freeing what would be ṭevel at another place¹⁰⁵It would be a cheap way of tithing to deposit one’s produce with a Gentile and then reclaiming it without taking heave and tithes!? He said to him, for all that is in it¹⁰⁶It is only equal to the Gentile’s produce if it is in it, i. e., if the produce was in order it does not become even demay at the Gentile’s, but it cannot lose its status of either demay or ṭevel.. Rebbi Ḥanina was uselessly opposing Rebbi Aḥa¹⁰⁷As explained above, this might be “R. Mana.”.

The following is obvious: A murderer who broke vessels or otherwise caused damage is liable to pay¹⁰²Since no crime can be punished more than once (Terumot 7:1 Notes 3–73, Ketubot3:1 Note 29; Babli Ketubot 32b, Bava qamma 36a, Makkot 7b, 13b), any damage done during the commission of a crime cannot be recovered from the criminal. Any damage caused before and after the crime has been committed can be recovered. The only question, the subject of the next two sentences, is whether the pursuit of the victim is part of the crime and protects the murderer from damage claims or not.. If he continued to break until he came to the town, Rebbi Zeˋira and Rebbi Hoshaia: One said, he pays, the other said, he does not pay. If the pursuer becomes the pursued, may one save the pursuer through the person of the pursued¹⁰³If the intended victim gets hold of a weapon and turns against the agressor, is there any cause for the uninvolved to act? The question is not answered.? An adult (who became)¹⁰⁴From the following text it seems clear that one has to read: If an adult was pursued by a minor, may one save the adult through the minor’s life? In a parallel text, Šabbat 14 (14d l. 67), the question is attributed to Rav Hisda, mentioned later here also. a minor, may one save the adult through the person of the minor? Rebbi Jeremiah objected, did we not state¹⁰⁵Mishnah Ahilut 7:6. If the life of the mother is endangered during childbirth, the attendants must kill the fetus by cutting it into pieces and removing it. But if head and torso are already outside, so that the baby is breathing on his own, he cannot be killed even if he is endangering his mother’s life. This is a case of a minor pursuing an adult.: “If his head and most of his body were born, one does not touch him, for one does not push aside one life for another.” Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said in the name of Rav Ḥisda: It is different there since you do not know who is killing whom¹⁰⁶Since the life of the baby is equally endangered, one cannot conclude that a minor intent on murder may not be killed by bystanders..